![\"Photographs](\"https:\/\/www.etap-lab.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/Photographs-of-the-external-and-internal-appearance-of-the-skin.png\")
Objectification of observations: Scoring of skin aspect<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
To objectify our observations of the external appearance of the skin, we have developed a scoring scale specifically for this model. This score allows us to measure both induction intensity and the effects of treatments. This score thus significantly increases in the MC903\/Vehicle group in comparison with the Ethanol\/Vehicle group (Fig. 2; p<0.001). The increase in the external skin appearance score was reduced by application of the reference molecule in the MC903\/U-50488 group (Fig 2. p<0.01), though it remained significantly higher than the score in the Ethanol\/Vehicle group (Fig 2. p<0.001).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Fig.2: Average scoring of external skin appearance +\/- SEM<\/p>\n\n\n\n (***; p<0.001 vs. Ethanol\/Vehicle; ##; p<0.001 vs. MC903\/Vehicle)<\/p>\n\n\n\n We counted the number of scratching events in animals in the different experimental groups, and characterised MC903\u2019s ability to induce itching. Indeed, for the MC903\/Vehicle group, we observed a significant increase in the number of scratching events, compared to the Ethanol\/Vehicle group (Fig3; p<0.001). Administration of U-50488 massively and significantly decreases this behaviour in comparison with the MC903\/Vehicle group, the number of scratching events being comparable to that of the Ethanol\/Vehicle group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Fig. 3: Average number of scratching events +\/- SEM<\/p>\n\n\n\n (***; p<0.001 vs. Ethanol\/Vehicle; ###; p<0.001 vs.MC903\/Vehicle)<\/p>\n\n\n\n The rupture of the skin barrier is common in cases of skin conditions and leads to a characteristic loss of water. Being able to measure both the deterioration of this barrier and its recovery is an important parameter both in terms of developing experimental models of skin pathologies and in terms of measuring the effectiveness of active molecules. Up until now, the measuring devices used have been fitted with only a few sensors, and there was a certain level of inaccuracy in measurement. Today ETAP-Lab is the first European preclinical CRO to be using the latest Tewametre\u00ae <\/strong>model, which has 30 sensors<\/strong>. The resulting improved accuracy of measurement makes it applicable to dermatology models.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Here are the first results using our model of DNCB- induced atopic dermatitis (Fig. 4).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Fig. 4: Average measurement of transepidermal water loss +\/- SEM<\/p>\n\n\n\n (***; p<0.001 vs. Vehicle)<\/p>\n\n\n\n We have observed that DNCB application results in a massive and significant increase in transepidermal water loss. The measurement accuracy reduces the variability of results, making it possible to differentiate between the efficacy of individual active products. This will be the subject of our next dermatology newsletter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Our experts will be delighted to answer any questions you may have on this subject.<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"Graphs](\"https:\/\/www.etap-lab.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/Scorage-of-skin-aspect-2.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nBehaviour: evaluation of the number of scratching events<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.etap-lab.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/nb-of-scratching-events-2.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nUpdate to our atopic dermatitis model: measurement of transepidermal water loss<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
![\"Atopic](\"https:\/\/www.etap-lab.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/Atopic-dermatitis-TEWL-.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n